Which Kind Are You?

Below is a list of 72 types of Americans that are considered to be “extremists” and “potential terrorists” from official U.S. government documents.

1.Those that talk about “individual liberties”

2.Those that advocate for states’ rights

3.Those that want “to make the world a better place” (OH goodie does this mean we can lock up all the demorats?)

4“The colonists who sought to free themselves from British rule"

5.Those that are interested in “defeating the Communists”

6.Those that believe “that the interests of one’s own nation are separate from the interests of other nations or the common interest of all nations”

7.Anyone that holds a “political ideology that considers the state to be unnecessary,harmful,or undesirable”

8.Anyone that possesses an “intolerance toward other religions”

9.Those that “take action to fight against the exploitation of the environment and/or animals”

10.“Anti-Gay”

11.“Anti-Immigrant”

12.“Anti-Muslim”

13.“The Patriot Movement”

14.“Opposition to equal rights for gays and lesbians”

15.Members of the Family Research Council

16.Members of the American Family Association

17.Those that believe that Mexico, Canada and the United States “are secretly planning to merge into a European Union-like entity that will be known as the ‘North American Union’”

18.Members of the American Border Patrol/American Patrol

19.Members of the Federation for American Immigration Reform

20.Members of the Tennessee Freedom Coalition

21.Members of the Christian Action Network

22.Anyone that is “opposed to the New World Order”

23.Anyone that is engaged in “conspiracy theorizing”(why bother the powers that be make their own)

24.Anyone that is opposed to Agenda 21

25.Anyone that is concerned about FEMA camps

26.Anyone that “fears impending gun control or weapons confiscations”

27.The militia movement

28.The sovereign citizen movement

29.Those that “don’t think they should have to pay taxes”

30.Anyone that “complains about bias”

31.Anyone that “believes in government conspiracies to the point of paranoia”

32.Anyone that “is frustrated with mainstream ideologies”

33.Anyone that “visits extremist websites/blogs”

34.Anyone that “establishes website/blog to display extremist views”

35.Anyone that “attends rallies for extremist causes”

36.Anyone that “exhibits extreme religious intolerance”

37.Anyone that “is personally connected with a grievance”

38.Anyone that “suddenly acquires weapons”

39.Anyone that “organizes protests inspired by extremist ideology”

40.“Militia or unorganized militia”

41.“General right-wing extremist”

42.Citizens that have “bumper stickers” that are patriotic or anti-U.N.

43.Those that refer to an “Army of God”

44. Those that are “fiercely nationalistic (as opposed to universal and international in orientation)”

45. Those that are “anti-global”

46. Those that are “suspicious of centralized federal authority”(Yep no doubt they never read the constitution)

47. Those that are “reverent of individual liberty”( and they say this is the USA?)

48. Those that “believe in conspiracy theories” (LOL after this last year who can not belive them)

49. Those that have “a belief that one’s personal and/or national ‘way of life’ is under attack”

50. Those that possess “a belief in the need to be prepared for an attack either by participating in paramilitary preparations and training or survivalism”

51. Those that would “impose strict religious tenets or laws on society (fundamentalists)”

52. Those that would “insert religion into the political sphere”

53. Anyone that would “seek to politicize religion”

54. Those that have “supported political movements for autonomy”

55. Anyone that is “anti-abortion”

56. Anyone that is “anti-Catholic”

57. Anyone that is “anti-nuclear”

58. “Rightwing extremists”

59. “Returning veterans”(Got to be my number one Fav. of the list)

60. Those concerned about “illegal immigration”(anybody that lives in the southwest)

61. Those that “believe in the right to bear arms”(OK just WTF)

62. Anyone that is engaged in “ammunition stockpiling” (Like FEMA?)

63. Anyone that exhibits “fear of Communist regimes”

64. “Anti-abortion activists”

65. Those that are against illegal immigration

66. Those that talk about “the New World Order” in a “derogatory” manner

67. Those that have a negative view of the United Nations

68. Those that are opposed “to the collection of federal income taxes”

(think they could get most people on April 16 every year on this one)

69. Those that supported former presidential candidates Ron Paul,Chuck Baldwin and Bob Barr

70. Those that display the Gadsden Flag (“Don’t Tread On Me”)

71. Those that believe in “end times” prophecies

72. Evangelical Christians

And so it goes.Think that just about covers everybody.I am sure there are more but tell you the truth I got tired of reading thru their crap.

The Ferret

Good By old friend ;(

Well I knew it had to happen he had a good run,but what timeing. My Garmin eTrex I bought in 2003 finely gave up the ghost,it's screen went all fuzzy then just faded away.Won't hold a charge or power up. From the rivers and sea of NC,to the mountians in Va.and WV.,to the middle of nowhere in Maine,to parts of Canada and the hot deserts of Az. it never let me down.*Sniff Sniff*
But Damn it did you have to croak this week?Car needs work,got preps to buy and trying to find some land around here.

The Ferret

First Signs of Civil War begin in the US: Sheriff DeMeo Threatens Force Against Federal Agents

Hmmmm, OK this could be a kick off or another case of hot air,But........

"It began with one Sheriff speaking with other Sheriffs about their oaths to uphold the constitution. A new movement is growing in this country in support of limited government, constitutional principles, states rights and a stronger role for sheriffs to play against federal abuse of power. In this 3-part video interview with Tony DeMeo, Sheriff of Nye County, Nevada, he explains that he is a Constitutional Sheriff and that authority for public office holders is derived from the people.
In his own words Sheriff Tony DeMeo describes an incident where federal agents of the BLM threaten him with arrest while the Sheriff issues his own threats of an armed response if illegal seizures of private property in his county continue. Imagine if BLM authorities went ahead with their “normal” operations of seizing cattle found on public property in direct opposition to Sheriff Tony DeMeo warnings? We would witness a standoff with dire consequences."

Full Story: RBM 



Eather way keep your bedroll and ammo dry.Anybody want some popcorn?

The Ferret

Into the land of Tinfoil........

Whatever happened to the $385 M (that's million) contract awarded to Kellog-Brown & Root/Halliburton to build temporary immigration detention centers?

 You know,the centers to be built for Homeland Security for an "influx of immigrants...natural disaster or for new programs that require additional detention space."

 At the time this contract was announced way back in 2006, a Homeland Security spokesperson stated "It's the type of contract that could be used in some kind of mass migration." This comment was followed by additional comments from the Army Corps of Engineers.The Corps talking head said "the centers could be at unused military sites or temporary structures...and would each hold up to 5,000 people."Just so you know I have that about right: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/04/national/04halliburton.html?_r=4&oref=login

 Our mainstream media has reported that the South of the Border workforce has been returning home because of our current economic situation and the Arizona law.With exception of the gulf(Half Ass anyway),the white house has pretty much blew off recent weather related emergencies,the oil spill in Michigan,so the states seem to be handling disasters well without any kind of new help from the fruitcakes in DC.

 So just what are these potential new programs that might require additional detention space?Who are these people that Homeland Security thinks/feels might be part of a mass migration?We are not birds humans do not migrate easly.Humans migrate for improved living conditions or at the point of a gun.

 Even back in the 80's with the Cuban Boat crisis,the Cubans were shiped to already existing military bases.Now True,little known military installations were used for this,and a detention staff was needed because Cuba took advantage of the situation by emptying its prisons and mental institutions and we had a huge influx of criminals and nut cases.Are we anticipating another boat crisis or something from down south?

 Better yet,who are these people who will need to be detained because of potential new programs?What new programs,nothing I have heard of?What kind of programs require detention space?Detention dennotes being held against one's will,and why would our government have a need for a program for detention?Just how does a government go about planning for an "unknown"event that will require detention,but gives them enought warning to build the places?

 It's the word detention that bothers me,frankly it smells.I don't think one would use the word detain if the government were providing assistance to victims of natural disaster.Perhaps the better word for this would have been shelter centers.That goes for whatever the government would view as mass migration.

 I don't know if any illegals have ever been "detained" in any of these centers supposedly to be built by KBR/Halliburton,or if in fact any centers were even built.The media is quite on the subject and from what I know about the handeling of illegals,is that most illegals were cut lose with a promise to appear in court,(yea right) or shipped back across the border soon after apprehension.I could be wrong this tho.

 I want to know the status of these detention centers.Were any actually built and are any of these sites manned by personnel?Are any U.S. citizens or non-citizens housed/detained in these sites?I also think the tax payer deserves an accounting of 385 Million dollars that belong to the tax payers of this country.

 I want to know exactly what kind of potential new program is being envisioned that would require the planning and operating of detention centers that could hold 5,000 people.Finally,who is going to man these detention centers if/when activated?Is this one of the new missions of Northern Command(and that is another one that scares the hell out of me)?Anybody out there have any answers?and I don't mean crap heard 3 or 4th hand.



Well what the hell did you think you were going to get?It is 2am here and I'm doing this on the fly,,but I still want to know.


The Ferret

Oakland PD Out For Donuts?

http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local-beat/Suffer-These-Crimes-in-Oakland-Dont-Call-the-Cops-98266509.html

Chief Anthony Batts listed exactly 44 situations that his officers will no longer respond to and they include grand theft, burglary, car wrecks, identity theft and vandalism. He says if you live and Oakland and one of the above happens to you, you need to let police know on-line.

Here's a partial list:

* burglary
* theft
* embezzlement
* grand theft
* grand theft:dog
* identity theft
* false information to peace officer
* required to register as sex or arson offender
* dump waste or offensive matter
* discard appliance with lock
* loud music
* possess forged notes
* pass fictitious check
* obtain money by false voucher
* fraudulent use of access cards
* stolen license plate
* embezzlement by an employee (over $ 400)
* extortion
* attempted extortion
* false personification of other
* injure telephone/ power line
* interfere with power line
* unauthorized cable tv connection
* vandalism
* administer/expose poison to another's

Man don't even know where to start with this one.Hope you folks out on the left coast have stocked up on ammo.Somehow I am not surprised that they are still going to be writeing speeding tickets.

The Ferret